It's interesting that when UNFORGIVEN was released every review show
that showed an excerpt would would always show the same clip - the
climax where Clint Eastwood's grizzled anti-hero walks in to the saloon
and informs Gene Hackman " I've killed everything that's walked and
crawled and now i've come to kill you little Bill " . This hooks the
audience in to thinking they're going to be watching one of these old
school Westerns where convention dictates if you want to survive then
you've got to be quick on the draw. This is entirely misleading because
UNFORGIVEN is very much an anti-western , something of an antidote to
the syrupy feel-good DANCES WITH WOLVES which kick started a mini boom
of the Western genre. Both films are at a polar opposite in most ways
but share a common ground in that they're both films that won the Oscar
for best pictures. They also share the common ground that they're
overlong
One wonders how well it would have been received during " The New
Hollywood " era ? There wouldn't have been much need to recast . You
could still have Eastwood , Hackman and Harris play the same
characters. One can speculate the critics wouldn't have held it in too
high regard because there wasn't enough violent action as seen in the
likes of HIGH PLAINS DRIFTER . David Webb Peoples screenplay is well
over long by about an hour and is populated by characters that don't
really drive the plot forward . Take for example the character of
English Bob superbly played by Richard Harris . He arrives in town is
beaten up by Little Bob , who arrests and taunts him in the town
jailhouse and is then run out of town . It's an acting tour de force by
both Harris and Hackman but what has this to do with anything except to
perhaps point out it's July the fourth ? It's a very loose screenplay
which puzzles me why it was so rewarded by that year's award shows
I can see what UNFORGIVEN is trying to do . The title alone points out
the subtext - it's a story of one man's redemption . The problem is
that the story for some perplexing reason introduces so many characters
that it looses focus on the person and clogs up the story unnecessarily
. These characters are cast very well and this saves the film from its
most obvious fault in that it's an overlong film lacking a central
narrative drive . You don't agree ? Imagine if Kevin Costner as Bill
Munney , Eddie Murphy as Ned Long , Hugh Grant as English Bob and Jason
Priestley as The Schofield Kid . Different film now isn't it ?
Popular Posts
-
This is one of the best "trial movies" ever made. It's an outstanding film that is just as good today as it was almost 50 ye...
-
Charlie Chaplin was funny. Charles Laughton was witty. As good as 'Witness For The Prosecution' is---Agatha Christie's story, th...
-
Witness for the Prosecution is, as IMDb voters cann attest, a great movie. A clever, character-driven courtroom drama, it deserved the Acade...
-
This is a fun movie, with marvelous performances by Laughton, Dietrich and Lanchester. Even the usually mediocre Tyrone Power fits his role ...
-
Clint Eastwood's storytelling gives the western genre one of its most sublime story's. Gone is the trademark mysterious hero and in ...
-
Contains Spoilers Who would have thought it? During the eighties, when the cinematic Western was at its lowest ebb, I doubt if anyone coul...
-
Let me explain. The best book on music I've ever read is "The Classical Style: Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven", by Charles Rose...
-
Leonard Steven Vole finds himself on trial for the murder of a wealthy widow from whom he has inherited a fortune. Top barrister Sir Wilfr...
-
WARNING! SPOILERS AHEAD! The Billy Wilder touch adds cynical wit to his sparkling adaptation of Dame Agatha Christie's play WITNESS FOR ...
-
" Unforgiven " may well be Clint Eastwood's greatest triumph as an actor and director. In this grim, dark, and yet strangel...
Blogger news
Un produs Blogger.